The AI pilot works. Does the business case?
The largest capital build-out in the history of computing is hunting for enterprise revenue, and African banking is the next licence market. The pilots impress. The income statements barely move. What separates the two is not technology but capital allocation.

Precursor
The timing of the sales call is not an accident. The global technology industry has sunk hundreds of billions of dollars into data centres and model training, and every vendor in that chain is now under pressure to show enterprise revenue on the other side of the capital spend. Having saturated the banks of New York and London, the sales teams have arrived in Nairobi, Lagos and Johannesburg with the same deck. Walk into almost any bank boardroom in Kenya this quarter and you will see it: a triumphant slide showing how a generative AI pilot shaved two minutes off customer-support calls. On the demonstration screen the technology looks effortless, yet inside the operating accounts the unit cost of serving that customer has barely moved. Financial institutions are developing a costly habit of confusing a faster conversation with a cheaper operation, signing enterprise-wide licences before asking whether the minutes saved ever reach the income statement. A 2025 review of enterprise generative-AI deployments by researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology reported that about 95 per cent of corporate pilots produced no measurable return on the profit and loss account, not because the models failed, but because the organisations around them never rewired the workflow that turns saved minutes into saved money.
The most careful evidence available says the gains are real but unevenly distributed. A 2025 study published in the Quarterly Journal of Economics by Erik Brynjolfsson, Danielle Li and Lindsey Raymond tracked 5,172 customer-support agents after a software firm introduced an AI assistant. Issue resolution rose by an average of 15 per cent per hour, but the headline hid a sharp split: less experienced agents captured almost all of the gains, while top-performing veterans gained virtually no speed and saw a slight dip in quality. Buying an identical monthly licence for every seat in the call centre therefore means paying a recurring fee that slows down your best people while subsidising a training shortcut for novices. For a Kenyan chief executive preparing the 2027 technology budget, a promising pilot never justifies a blanket rollout. It forces a hard capital-allocation choice between equipping new hires and fixing broken back-office settlement pipes.
Continue reading
KES 49 for the rest of this piece.
About 694 more words, including the reasoning and what it means for operators. One payment, this piece, kept for good. No subscription and no renewal.
The Precursor Editorial Team
Precursor is published by the FinTech Association of Kenya and exercises independent editorial judgement under the Editorial Independence Charter. This article is labelled Independent: no commercial party reviewed it before publication.
If AI Is Taking the Entry-Level Jobs, What Exactly Should Kenyan Schools Be Preparing Students For?
Generative AI is already automating the writing, coding, research and administrative work that once gave graduates their first step into formal employment. Kenya’s education system therefore faces a more immediate challenge than teaching students how to use chatbots. It must decide which human skills will still command value when machines can produce the assignment, draft the memo and increasingly perform the job itself.
Policy & Regulation · 18 min read