Published by the FinTech Association of Kenya
PRECURSORSubscribe
Precursor Executive Classroom

Lecture 39 ยท Equity set up a staff share plan for KSh1,000, and the benefit to employees carried a KSh234 million PAYE charge.

๐‘ป๐’‰๐’† ๐‘ช๐’‚๐’”๐’† ๐‘น๐’๐’๐’Ž: Equity argued it had spent almost nothing on its employee share plan, so there was no benefit to tax. The Tribunal and High Court held the benefit is measured by what the employee gains, not what the employer spends, and that PAYE was due on the discount, a charge of KSh234 million.

By The Precursor Editorial Team, Tax and financial judgement ยท 4 min read,
Lecture 39 ยท Equity set up a staff share plan for KSh1,000, and the benefit to employees carried a KSh234 million PAYE charge.

Illustration: Precursor

Your bank sets up a share ownership plan that lets staff acquire shares below market value and hold them to vesting. The plan costs the employer almost nothing to establish. The authority says the discount the employees enjoy is a taxable employment benefit.

Put yourself in the head of tax's chair. Is the benefit measured by what the plan cost you, or by what the employee received?

Continue reading

KES 49 for the rest of this piece.

About 671 more words, including the reasoning and what it means for operators. One payment, this piece, kept for good. No subscription and no renewal.

Sign in to buy for KES 49Google takes a moment, and your purchase stays with you.

The Precursor Editorial Team

Precursor is published by the FinTech Association of Kenya and exercises independent editorial judgement under the Editorial Independence Charter. This article is labelled Precursor Executive Classroom, which marks commercial material. Knowledge on Tax and financial judgement.

More on this system

Precursor Executive Classroom

Lecture 126 ยท A director kept meeting the taxman instead of appealing, and four years on the bill had only grown.

๐‘ป๐’‰๐’† ๐‘ช๐’‚๐’”๐’† ๐‘น๐’๐’๐’Ž: KRA confirmed a KSh 899,328 income-tax bill against Saphira, and its director spent four years in meetings and relied on his compliance certificates instead of appealing. The tribunal held meetings do not stop the thirty-day clock, a certificate is not proof of payment, and refused leave to appeal out of time; the debt had grown to KSh 1.4 million.

Tax and financial judgement ยท 4 min read ยท Paid

Precursor Executive Classroom

Lecture 125 ยท A rice importer called cleaning and repacking manufacturing, and the court said packaging is not making.

๐‘ป๐’‰๐’† ๐‘ช๐’‚๐’”๐’† ๐‘น๐’๐’๐’Ž: Mjengo claimed an investment deduction on KSh 1.5 million of machinery that cleaned and repackaged imported rice, calling it manufacturing. Through three forums the ruling held that packaging alone is not making goods, the rice remained rice, and a definition framed with 'means' is exhaustive. The deduction was refused.

Tax and financial judgement ยท 4 min read ยท Paid

Precursor Executive Classroom

Lecture 124 ยท A contractor said the money was his clients', had no agreements to show it, and the assessment stood.

๐‘ป๐’‰๐’† ๐‘ช๐’‚๐’”๐’† ๐‘น๐’๐’๐’Ž: KRA billed MU-BEI KSh 1.7 million after its eTIMS invoices far exceeded its declared sales. The company said the money was clients' funds for materials, passed on as an agent, but had no written agency agreements and no reconciliation. The tribunal held VAT fell due on the invoices and dismissed the appeal.

Tax and financial judgement ยท 4 min read ยท Paid