Published by the FinTech Association of Kenya
PRECURSORSubscribe
Precursor Executive Classroom

Lecture 25 Β· Customs saw rice that KRM's ledger did not

𝑻𝒉𝒆 π‘ͺ𝒂𝒔𝒆 π‘Ήπ’π’π’Ž: KRA matched a rice importer's customs entries against its purchase ledger and found shipments missing from the books. The company said it had sent documents. The Tax Appeals Tribunal asked which documents, and for what.

By The Precursor Editorial Team, Tax and financial judgement Β· 4 min read,
Lecture 25 Β· Customs saw rice that KRM's ledger did not

Precursor

The case

KRM Commodities Ltd imported and distributed rice. Comparing customs data with its purchase ledgers and returns for 2021 to 2023, KRA found unreconciled variances of KSh 11.3m for 2021 and KSh 184.6m for 2023. It also found that the company had paid audit, legal and quota fees without deducting withholding tax.

KRA assessed the company on 31 July 2025. KRM objected four weeks later. Duties and taxes, it said, were already in its direct expenses and KRA had counted them twice. KRA's 20% gross margin was arbitrary. The government had allowed duty-free rice imports in 2023. And some of the imports belonged to another company, which had used KRM's unused quota.

Continue reading

KES 49 for the rest of this piece.

About 721 more words, including the reasoning and what it means for operators. One payment, this piece, kept for good. No subscription and no renewal.

Sign in to buy for KES 49Google takes a moment, and your purchase stays with you.

The Precursor Editorial Team

Precursor is published by the FinTech Association of Kenya and exercises independent editorial judgement under the Editorial Independence Charter. This article is labelled Precursor Executive Classroom, which marks commercial material. Knowledge on Tax and financial judgement.

More on this system

Precursor Executive Classroom

Lecture 2 Β· KRA’s own letter saved Maisha Mabati KSh 1.44bn.

𝑻𝒉𝒆 π‘ͺ𝒂𝒔𝒆 π‘Ήπ’π’π’Ž: The Tax Appeals Tribunal held the Commissioner to a VAT exemption it had confirmed three times. The company won. Its board should never have needed to.

Tax and financial judgement Β· 6 min read

Precursor Executive Classroom

Lecture 4 Β· A WhatsApp group helped beat a KSh 40m tax bill.

𝑻𝒉𝒆 π‘ͺ𝒂𝒔𝒆 π‘Ήπ’π’π’Ž: KRA taxed the money that passed through Francis Mugwi Kamau's accounts as if all of it were income. The Tax Appeals Tribunal ruled that a bank statement shows cash moving, and that KRA had to weigh his explanations for it.

Tax and financial judgement Β· 5 min read Β· Paid

Precursor Executive Classroom

Lecture 21 Β· Premier Caterers sent its documents a week too late.

𝑻𝒉𝒆 π‘ͺ𝒂𝒔𝒆 π‘Ήπ’π’π’Ž: A catering company lost most of a KSh 4.4m dispute because its bank deposits ran ahead of its declared sales and its expenses lacked proof of payment. Its further documents arrived seven days after KRA's decision, and nothing in the law let KRA look at them.

Tax and financial judgement Β· 4 min read Β· Paid