Published by the FinTech Association of Kenya
PRECURSORSubscribe
Precursor Executive Classroom

Lecture 24 Β· A fire took the records. The VAT bill survived.

𝑻𝒉𝒆 π‘ͺ𝒂𝒔𝒆 π‘Ήπ’π’π’Ž: A Nairobi drum trader said he was only an agent, and that fire and a vanished accountant had taken his proof. The Tax Appeals Tribunal asked for evidence of the agency, the fire and the accountant, and found none.

By The Precursor Editorial Team, Tax and financial judgement Β· 4 min read,
Lecture 24 Β· A fire took the records. The VAT bill survived.

Precursor

The case

Rynus Kinya, a sole trader in Nairobi, said his business was simple. His principal client paid him, and he paid the small traders who supplied the drums, by M-Pesa or in cash, keeping a margin. In his view the money was mostly the principal's, passing through his hands.

The withholding certificates his client filed told KRA a different story: they showed a supplier with large VAT-able sales. KRA assessed additional VAT of KSh 26,402,401. Kinya objected late, in January 2025. KRA accepted the late objection and asked for documents. He could not supply them, and on 20 March 2025 KRA confirmed the assessment.

Continue reading

KES 49 for the rest of this piece.

About 706 more words, including the reasoning and what it means for operators. One payment, this piece, kept for good. No subscription and no renewal.

Sign in to buy for KES 49Google takes a moment, and your purchase stays with you.

The Precursor Editorial Team

Precursor is published by the FinTech Association of Kenya and exercises independent editorial judgement under the Editorial Independence Charter. This article is labelled Precursor Executive Classroom, which marks commercial material. Knowledge on Tax and financial judgement.

More on this system

Precursor Executive Classroom

Lecture 3 Β· How A CEO’s personal account became a KSh 163.9m tax bill.

𝑻𝒉𝒆 π‘ͺ𝒂𝒔𝒆 π‘Ήπ’π’π’Ž: Mary Wanjiru Kinyua said KSh 413m in deposits were company sales and loans. Without the paperwork, the courts treated the money as hers, and the one point she won was worth a rounding error.

Tax and financial judgement Β· 6 min read

Precursor Executive Classroom

Lecture 10 Β· Galaxy Tools bought from suppliers nobody could find.

𝑻𝒉𝒆 π‘ͺ𝒂𝒔𝒆 π‘Ήπ’π’π’Ž: KRA found that ten of a company's suppliers had no premises, no trading history and almost no other customers, and had been paid in cash. The Tribunal said valid invoices were enough. The High Court said invoices only open the argument.

Tax and financial judgement Β· 5 min read Β· Paid

Precursor Executive Classroom

Lecture 13 Β· Lamnas bought from a supplier who had died in 2021

𝑻𝒉𝒆 π‘ͺ𝒂𝒔𝒆 π‘Ήπ’π’π’Ž: KRA traced the PIN on a company's purchase invoices to a trader buried two years before the first sale. The company blamed a former accountant. The Tribunal held that a dead man cannot supply goods, and upheld KSh 3.5m.

Tax and financial judgement Β· 4 min read Β· Paid